It 's true that no one, the house edge casino a roulette game beat?
In the 20 first century, Albert Einstein has many challenges to the completeness of quantum theory, which is presented by the physicist Max Planck in 1900. The challenge for his comments raised the famous "God does not play dice." He believed that everything in the universe there is no law and order and not to rely on probability, described in quantum theory.
Therefore, when they are beneficial to the game of roulette with the Casino "House Edge", was actually misled the entireWorld of gambling by a statement that "no one can beat roulette system when the money if the dealer does not look to steal it." It 's true that neither the one nor the system "to beat the casino" house advantage?
In the new century, mathematicians more and more players and the incompleteness of the statement that Albert Einstein had discovered believe that Albert Einstein knew it and did not want the world to find out.
They foundthat, "You can not change the boundary edge of the house in one movement, or bet on the game of roulette, but you can reduce and phase out the benefit of home advantage in the series revolves. Do not let this evil, speak no method common development them.
In the ordinary course of the method proposed by many gurus, you can easily end up with more than $ 1,000,000 bet after doubling the bet to 13 times the initial bet of $ 25. Mostthe method of progression not only failed to challenge the huge accumulated is required, but also the progression of the breakage, when the number house edge (0 and / or 00) taken.
I recently read in a book betting strategy roulette struck by the fact that the system can be claimed Roulette 3 easy reverse steps.1 casino house advantage of a player with 2-delay, the bet; 3-propagating betting platform.
I realize that this strategy actually overcome the fundamental weakness ofthe usual method, delaying the progression of the first player to bet after 6 similar results occur continuously. At the same time, the strategy of waiting times, reducing the roulette tables at once. Another thing I like about this strategy, the author has already involves a combination bet on the edge of the house number (0 and / or 00) too. It directly reverses the margin 5.26% house advantage for the player.
We can not accept thatAuthor successfully beat the house edge, but we can not deny that some house-edge threat has been reduced.
Danos tu comentario
Post a Comment